• Twitter
  • LinkedIn
(503) 212-0687 | hello@cascadeinsights.com
Cascade Insights
  • Market Research Services
    • B2B Customer Experience Research
      • Buyer Personas
      • Buyer’s Journey Research
      • Key Buying Criteria Research
      • Jobs-To-Be-Done Research
      • User Personas
      • Customer Satisfaction Research
    • B2B Product/Service Research
      • Market Opportunity Research
      • Concept Testing
      • Go-To-Market Research
    • B2B Marketing Enablement Research
      • Data-Driven Marketing Research
      • Message Testing
      • Brand Research
      • Thought Leadership Services
      • Partner Enablement
    • B2B Sales Enablement Research
      • Competitive Landscape Analysis
      • Win-Loss Research
      • Churn Analysis
      • Channel Research
  • Marketing Services
    • Marketing Strategy
    • Messaging
    • Content Marketing
    • Sales Enablement
  • Insights and Perspectives
    • B2B Market Research Blog
    • B2B Marketing Blog
    • B2B Resources
  • About Us
    • Our Story
    • Our Clients
    • Client Testimonials
    • Careers
    • Ethics Policy
    • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

The “Competitive Intel” Episode 4 Transcript – Analysis of Competing Hypothesis and the Battle of Ideas

February 13, 2012/in Blog Posts /by Sean Campbell
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail

Making Intelligence Smarter: Analysis of Competing Hypotheses

A portion of competitive intelligence work is simply gathering source information. However that information’s value depends in part on how well analysts can develop defensible conclusions from hypotheses that are often at odds with each other. Borrowing from public sector intelligence practice, the analysis of competing hypotheses (ACH) framework tests different interpretations by plotting hypotheses against evidence using a two-dimensional matrix.

Populating the Horizontal Axis: Hypotheses

The first step of the ACH approach is to gather hypotheses about a potential future event, business situation, or competitor move, and create a column in the matrix for each hypothesis. Potential entries for this horizontal axis could come from sources such as brainstorming sessions, blog-based commentary, social media, interviews with subject matter experts, and many other common intelligence sources.

There is often a hierarchical structure to the hypotheses. “Windows 8 will rapidly achieve large market share” could be a top-level hypothesis, with sub-hypotheses such as “small businesses will be slow to adopt Windows 8” and “Windows 8 will accelerate upgrades from Windows XP.”.

Populating the Vertical Axis: Evidence

Companies weighing their responses to events must consider multiple hypotheses. Following the example above, a software company deciding what resources to apply to supporting Windows 8 will want to have an understanding of the likely adoption of the new OS within its customer base. To support that understanding, pieces of evidence are populated along the horizontal axis of the matrix, so that the impact of each can be considered against the hypotheses.

Pieces of evidence to be used for ACH can come from any source used in competitive intelligence research, including open source intelligence (such as job postings or resumes from LinkedIn), first-party interviews, and industry events. General marketing materials such as feature lists or price points are also valuable.

Gleaning Insight from Intersection Points within the Matrix

Once the matrix is populated, analysis should proceed in a structured manner.. Each intersection in the matrix is first identified as “consistent,” inconsistent,” or “not applicable,” based on the support (or lack of support) by a specific piece of evidence for a given hypothesis. The next step is to tally a score for each hypothesis, based on the number of pieces of evidence that support it, minus the number that contradict it. Potential conclusions can then be ranked on that basis; note that, in some cases, a single piece of inconsistent evidence can disqualify a hypothesis from further consideration.

Using ACH can provide the ability to empirically establish the validity of multiple hypotheses, where there would otherwise be a tangled, contradictory mass of opinions.

By Sean Campbell
By Scott Swigart

Get in touch

"*" indicates required fields

Name
Cascade Insights will never share your information with third parties. View our privacy policy.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Bio
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Latest Posts
Sean Campbell

Sean Campbell

CEO
Sean Campbell is the CEO of Cascade Insights, a competitive intelligence and market research firm for B2B technology companies. A 20-year technology veteran, Sean oversees the health of the firm, drives the company’s thought leadership efforts and maintains relationships with key clients.
Sean Campbell

@sean_campbell

Sean Campbell
Sean Campbell

Latest posts by Sean Campbell (see all)

  • B2B Market Research: Exposing the Truth - August 23, 2022
  • B2B Focus Groups: Virtual for the Win - June 7, 2022
  • B2B Buyer’s Journey: Buyers and Marketers in the Blender - March 8, 2022
Tags: competitive intelligence
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share by Mail
You might also like
What LinkedIn ad data reveals about the tech gender gap.The “Competitive Intel” Episode 28 Transcript – Flyby on Wargaming
What LinkedIn ad data reveals about the tech gender gap.The “Competitive Intel” Episode 10 Transcript – Don’t fetch sticks: fetch answers: Orienting CI Efforts around KIQ’s
Real Buyers vs Imaginary Friends | B2B Market Segmentation | Cascade InsightsB2B Market Segmentation Research: Real Buyers vs. Imaginary Friends
What LinkedIn ad data reveals about the tech gender gap.The “Competitive Intel” Episode 20 Transcript – What is the Competitor’s Pricing?
Sales Needs A Say In StrategySales Needs A Say In Strategy
What LinkedIn ad data reveals about the tech gender gap.The “Competitive Intel” Episode 21 Transcript – The Fiscal Cliff and Competitive Intelligence
Qual: There's an App For That | smartphone qualitative researchQual: There’s An App For That
What LinkedIn ad data reveals about the tech gender gap.The Gender Gap: A Look at 50 Tech Giants

GET IN TOUCH

hello@cascadeinsights.com

(503) 898-0004

WHAT WE DO

Market Research Services
Marketing Services
Subscribeto RSS Feed

Blog Categories

  • B2B Buyer Persona Research
  • B2B Channel Market Research
  • B2B Churn Analysis
  • B2B Competitive Landscape Analysis
  • B2B Customer Experience Research
  • B2B Customer Journey Mapping
  • B2B Go-To-Market Research
  • B2B Market Opportunity Research
  • B2B Market Research Blog
  • B2B Market Segmentation Research
  • B2B Marketing Blog
    • Uncategorized
  • B2B Messaging
  • B2B New Product Launch Research
  • B2B Thought Leadership
  • B2B Usability Testing
  • Brand Research
  • Concept Testing
  • Content Marketing
  • Customer Satisfaction Research
  • Data-Driven Marketing Research
  • Jobs-To-Be-Done
  • Key Buying Criteria
  • Marketing Enablement
  • Marketing Strategy
  • Message Testing Research
  • Partner Enablement
  • Product/Service Research
  • Sales Enablement Marketing
  • Sales Enablement Research
  • User Personas
  • Videos
  • Win/Loss Analysis

Written by

Sean Campbell
Sean Campbell

RECENT POSTS

  1. The “Competitive Intel” Episode 9 Transcript – Reverse Engineering a Competitor Customer List
  2. The “Competitive Intel” Episode 17 Transcript – Researching Private Companies
  3. After The Sale: 11 Market Research Questions for B2B Customers
  4. Your Favorite B2B Podcasts of 2017

Connect With Us

503.212.0687

hello@cascadeinsights.com

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

B2B Market Research

  • Customer Experience Research
  • — Buyer Persona Research
  • — Buyer's Journey Research
  • — Key Buying Criteria Research
  • — Jobs-To-Be-Done Research
  • — User Personas
  • — Customer Satisfaction Research

  • B2B Product/Service Research
  • — Market Opportunity Research
  • — Concept Testing
  • — Go-To-Market Research

  • Marketing Enablement Research
  • — B2B Data-Driven Marketing Research
  • — Message Testing
  • — Brand Research
  • — Thought Leadership
  • — Partner Enablement

  • Sales Enablement Research
  • — Competitive Landscape Analysis
  • — Win Loss Analysis
  • — Churn Analysis
  • — Channel Research

B2B Marketing

  • — B2B Marketing Strategy
  • — B2B Messaging Services
  • — B2B Content Marketing
  • — B2B Sales Enablement

About Us

  • — Our Story
  • — Our Clients
  • — Client Testimonials
  • — Careers
  • — Ethics Policy
  • — Privacy Policy

Blogs

  • — B2B Market Research Blog
  • — B2B Marketing Blog
  • — Cascade Insights Blog
Cascade Insights is proud to be a member of the Inc. 5000.
The “Competitive Intel” Episode 3 Transcript – Every Day OSINT...The “Competitive Intel” Episode 5 Transcript – Reporters and Competitive...
Scroll to top